What is the primary difference between the Procedural Service and Deconfliction Service?

The primary distinction between the Procedural Service and Deconfliction Service lies in the method and context of the information provided to pilots and controllers, which is best encapsulated by the use of radar.

In the Procedural Service, controllers rely on procedural separation methods that do not use real-time radar data. Instead, this service is based on coordinated flight plans and specified airspace rules to maintain separation between aircraft, which means that it primarily caters to less congested airspace or during specific phases of flight where radar coverage is limited.

In contrast, Deconfliction Service employs radar technology to monitor aircraft positions and provide real-time information about potential conflicts. This allows controllers to give precise advice that actively manages aircraft separation and adjustments to flight paths based on the current traffic situation. The use of radar significantly enhances the ability to provide timely and effective separation and conflict resolution.

Understanding this key difference in radar usage clarifies how each service operates within the air traffic management framework, emphasizing the importance of technology in enhancing safety and efficiency in controlled airspace.